Green Habitats white paper
Prepared by Jennifer Duell-Popovec for John Lie-Nielsen
January 16, 2007
CONTENTS
Executive Summary 1
Green Demand Grows 1
Educational Programs 2
Green Building Guidance 3
Why Build Green 5
Green Communities 7
Green Building Basics 10
About The Author 11
Executive Summary
Green home building is finally moving into the mainstream after several years of slow but steady growth across the country. More and more builders are interested in sustainable design and green building principles – not only because it's good for the environment, but because homeowners are demanding it. The day is fast approaching when builders will want to construct green homes because they sell easier and for more money. They are realizing that green building really does pay.
But, most builders are at a loss of how to go about green building. The desire is there, but the know-how isn't. Green building experts are few and far between, even though the number of them has grown significantly over the past 10 years. Homebuilding in America cannot move toward green building without increasing awareness and improving educational opportunities related to sustainability.
Green demand grows
Although nine out of 10 people surveyed by the American Institute of Architects said they'd be willing to pay $5,000 more to build or buy a house that would use less energy or protect the earth, only two percent of housing starts were green construction in 2005 even though the number of home builders producing green, environmentally responsible homes grew 20 percent.
That number is expected to increase, and by 2010, green homes will account for five percent to 10 percent all of residential construction activity, according to the Residential Green Building SmartMarket Report. by McGraw-Hill Construction and the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB).
Educational programs
Part of the on-going challenge with green building and sustainable develop is the lack of education and awareness on the part of both builders and consumers. Green building professionals are in strong demand, and they can't be found on every corner. A few formal educational programs exist, but more are definitely needed, according to industry experts.
For example, the NAHB Research Center has partnered with the Lancaster County Career and Technology Center (LCCTC) in Pennsylvania to develop one of the first homes rated under the new NAHB Model Green Home Building Guidelines as a field evaluation project for the Partnership for Advancing Technology in Housing (PATH).
The project aims to successfully combine the PATH goal of accelerating knowledge of advanced technologies to improve home performance with the school's goals of creating a technologically advanced workforce, new markets and resources in the local economy; and meeting academic science standards.
Each year, students enrolled in the school's building and construction program build a home as an applied learning project, and complete 90 percent of the trade work. Sustainable advanced building products and processes are being added to the curriculum this year.
Construction of the green home was kicked off in early October with a groundbreaking ceremony at the school's Mount Joy campus.
The Research Center began the first phase of the project in March, working with LCCTC staff and members of the local home building industry to develop the home's green and energy-efficient design. Submitted by a local builder, the base home design that was selected for the project already had some energy-efficient features, such as sealed ductwork and Energy Star® appliances.
The finished design for the home scores a Gold rating under NAHB's model guidelines, with a rating of 400. As construction of the home progresses, Research Center experts will provide ongoing technical support and training on advanced products and practices for faculty and students.
The home, the first of four in the project, is scheduled for completion in 2007 and will be open for tours during the Building Industry Association of Lancaster County's Parade of Homes in the spring. The Lancaster County Green Building Community Education Project is being supported through grants from the National Housing Endowment, the BIA of Lancaster County, the Lancaster County Building Industry Foundation and the Lancaster County Commissioners' Office.
Efforts to generate the next generation of green building experts are underway, but are not very advanced. Only a few universities and colleges have formal degree programs and the opportunities for "field" research are limited.
Arizona State University The College of Environmental Design combines in a single academic unit professional instruction in architecture, city and regional planning, landscape architecture, and environmental planning, along with related undergraduate and advanced graduate instructional programs. The college consists of three departments: Architecture, City and Regional Planning, and Landscape Architecture and Environmental Planning.
Georgia Institute of Technology has an Institute for Sustainable Technology and Development that focuses on sustainability in all facets through research and laboratory work.
Yale University School of Architecture/School of Forestry & Environmental Studies offers a joint-degree program in Architecture and Environmental Management. This program is directed to individuals who wish to pursue careers in sustainable design and development at the urban-to-regional scale with a special concern for ecosystem benefits and impacts at the site, local, regional, and global scales.
Michigan State University Environmental Design is broadly interpreted to embrace the planning, design, and management of the environment. The degree program recognizes the breadth of professions and disciplines engaged in this endeavor. The environmental design graduate degree offers students with professional undergraduate training to specialize in a particular area of the planning, design, and management of the environment such as golf course architecture, therapeutic environments, and surface mine reclamation.
The Foothill College Environmental Horticulture & Design Program combines principles of environmental design, construction and maintenance practices for urban, rural and natural landscapes. Students learn about the range of business services and manufacturing industries supporting the environmental horticulture industry.
University of Massachusetts Bachelor of Science in Environmental Design boasts four degree programs with a concentration in urban studies, landscape studies, horticultural studies or the built environment.
Green building guidance
In general, green building describes efforts to apply innovative and environmentally sensitive construction techniques and products to reduce energy and water consumption and improve residential comfort and safety.
While green building guidelines for commercial developments like office building, shopping centers and industrial facilities have existed for nearly 10 years, homebuilders that wanted to build green had to make their own rules.
In many cases, cities and counties took matters into their own hands. The City of Austin, Texas, for example, established the first local green building program in the country. The program rates homes on a scale of one to five stars – the more green features, the more stars earned. Overall, there are about 70 regional groups across the country promoting green building in their own regions including the Southface Energy Institute in Atlanta, Ga., which works with the Greater Atlanta Home Builders Association to educate builders. Build It Green in Berkeley, CA is another.
In addition to these local programs, the NAHB rolled out the "Model Green Home Building Guidelines" in 2005. The Guidelines were designed to help bring residential green building into the mainstream by demystifying the process and debunking the myths of green building for both consumers and home builders.
NAHB’s Guidelines allow local building industry associations to provide green building education and certification that is customized to each region’s geography, building style, and buyer demand.
Using the Guidelines, local home building associations are creating regionally appropriate green building programs for interested builders, and that interest is growing rapidly. Twelve state and local associations have launched voluntary green building programs, with another dozen on the way.
Programs based on the NAHB Model Green Home Building Guidelines are going strong in St. Louis – where more than 100 green homes are under construction – as well as a number of other jurisdictions, including Durham, N.C.; Albuquerque, N.M.; Dallas; Kansas City and Cleveland.
Last month, the first statewide program based on NAHB’s Guidelines, Green Built Michigan, was launched. Launches are also planned in suburban Philadelphia, Boston, central Arizona, Minneapolis-St. Paul, Las Vegas and the greater Baltimore area, among others.
In addition to the NAHB, the United States Green Building Council (USGBC) is piloting a program to evaluate single-family homes. Widely recognized for its Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) program for commercial buildings including residential high-rises and garden-style apartments, the USGBC's residential program is called LEED for Homes program or LEED-H.
The USGBC intends to roll out LEED-H nationally this summer, and currently has 500 family homes in the pilot program seeking certification in 12 different regions across the country. The program is a rigorous, points-based system that differs significantly from the NAHB's Guidelines.
The core rating metrics used within LEED-H are presented to end users in checklist form separated into eight categories. The pilot checklist now has 108 points; 30 points earns a Certified rating; 50 to 69 points earns a Silver rating; 70 to 89 points earns Gold; and 90 to 108 points earns Platinum.
Each checklist category includes “mandatory measures” that every house must comply with and optional ways for builders to score points. The categories include:
Locations and Linkages, which awards points for things like locating near existing infrastructure, avoiding environmentally sensitive sites, and clustering homes;
Sustainable Sites requires erosion control and includes options like eco-landscaping, permeable paving, and shading;
Water Efficiency covers everything from low-flow fixtures to rainwater harvesting;
Indoor Environmental Quality applies mostly to mechanical systems;
Materials and Resources rewards a small footprint (and penalizes oversized houses) while encouraging efficient framing and the use of local materials and products produced in a sustainable way;
Energy and Atmosphere is based on lowering energy use (Energy Star compliance is the mandatory minimum);
Homeowner Awareness offers one point if the builder offers an advanced owner’s manual or extra homeowner training
Innovation and Design Process is a catchall to encourage creativity: builders can earn up to four points for their green solutions, like optimized logistics.
Within the LEED-H program, builders can’t certify their own checklist performance. They must pay a USGBC-recognized LEED-H “provider” to certify their checklist performance. Only 11 providers are enrolled in the program so far, all with advanced expertise in energy-efficient and sustainable construction practices.
Builders must incur costs for the performance audits, as well as costs to upgrade the homes so they pass the audits. It can cost up to $3,000 per home to get LEED-H Certified by the USGBC-approved inspectors and requires the completion of six forms. The USGBC estimates that upgrades to a $300,000 home to certify it for LEED-H would cost around $10,000. These costs obviously must be absorbed by the builder or tacked on to the price of the home.
In Philadelphia, LEED-H is being tested by locally based Energy Coordinating Agency (ECA), a private nonprofit serving 30,000 low-income households. The ECA has persuaded the Philadelphia Housing Authority to adopt the Energy Star standard, with ECA serving as the HERS rater.
Why build green?
Most green building only costs two percent to 10 percent more because of the availability of green building products and materials. Many experts have compared green building materials to the availability of organic food. Fifteen years ago, consumers were forced to pay a premium for organic goods because they were hard to find; today, there are far more organic food producers, which has increased availability and decreased prices.
Essentially, building "green" means that we, as humans, leave the smallest footprint we can on the planet. According to the NAHB survey, the leading reason that builders are considering green is that “it’s the right thing to do." Of those polled, 92 percent identified this factor as a very or somewhat important influence behind the decision to go green.
Minimizing a footprint involves: planning construction to minimize the waste of building materials; reducing water consumption by adding low-volume toilets or rainwater filtration systems; and working with products that are sustainable (wool carpeting, bamboo flooring, cotton insulation) or recycled (salvaged wood, steel made with reused rebar, insulation made from paper products).
A green home is well-insulated and energy-efficient, reducing an owner's monthly heating and cooling costs. A green home uses materials that won't off-gas and pollute the indoor air, protecting the health of the home's inhabitants and cuts down on medical costs. A green home comprise materials that are renewable and relatively impervious to moisture and the elements, resulting in a more durable home that is easy to maintain, keeping the cost of home maintenance down.
Traditionally constructed homes still waste a mind-boggling amount of fossil fuel, losing 15 percent to 20 percent of its heat or air-conditioning leakage from ducts alone, according to Energy Star, a joint program of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the U.S. Department of Energy.
Efforts to go green are not being ignored, either. In February 2006, the IRS announced a provision under the Energy Policy Act of 2005 in which builders who construct a new, energy-efficient home may qualify for a credit of up to $2,000.
To qualify, a home must
be certified to provide heating and cooling energy consumption that
is at least 30 to 50 percent in the case of manufactured homes and 50
percent for other homes - below that of a comparable home constructed
in accordance with the standards of the 2004 Supplement to the 2003
International Energy Conservation Code. It must also have building
envelope component improvements providing a level of heating and
cooling energy consumption that is at least 10 percent below that of
a comparable home.
There are also some significant tax credits
available on the state and federal level that may help pay for
improvements. A credit of up to $500 on form 1040 may be claimed for
installing energy-efficient windows, insulation, doors, roofs,
boilers and air conditioners.
Moreover, Fannie Mae, one of the biggest housing lenders in the world, recognizes that energy-efficient homes cost homeowners less to operate on a monthly basis than standard homes and that these homeowners can afford to spend more on their housing expenses. The agency now offers Energy Efficient Mortgages that allow borrowers to qualify for a larger mortgage as a result.
Green communities
With so much evidence to support the idea that green building is good for the environment, homeowners and their bank accounts, quite a few builders – both large and small – are now constructing homes with green materials and principles.
Grand Rapids, Mich.-based Legacy Homes, for example, builds homes in that cost between two percent and four percent more than standard construction, according to president Jeff Wassenaar. Legacy homes include: walls insulated with draft-stopping foam; floors covered in wood from a sustainable forest; and rooms finished with nontoxic paint.
In Madison, Wis. for example, local homebuilder Veridian participates in Wisconsin’s Green Built Homes program and is striving to achieve LEED-H certification on six newly completed homes.
Similarly, Christopherson Homes in Santa Rosa, Calif., which builds roughly 300 homes per year in Northern California, has earned Build It Green’s “GreenPoint Rated” certification. The builder is behind Mane's Ranch, the first green home development in Sonoma County, Calif. All homes were built in accordance with Santa Rosa's original green building guidelines, which have since become more rigorous.
Aspen Homes of Colorado, the NAHB Research Center's 2006 Silver Energy Value Housing Award winner, and Northeast Natural Homes in Syracuse, N.Y. are additional examples.
Moreover, commercial developers that specialize in green building are bringing their expertise to the single-family home industry. For example, Raleigh, N.C.-based Cherokee Investment Partners, a firm that specializing in brownfield mitigation, has recently completed a demonstration home outside its headquarters. The home should use 50 percent less fossil fuel and water than conventional homes and is expected to recycle or reuse 90 percent of organic waste. The home was built to builders of large residential developments that they can incorporate green techniques, at little extra cost, into their projects.
Green building has also generated enough attention that several large programs have been rolled out. For example, Green Communities is a five-year, $555 million initiative to build more than 8,500 environmentally healthy homes for low-income families. The initiative, sponsored by Enterprise Community Partners, provides grants, financing, tax-credit equity and technical assistance to developers who meet Green Communities Criteria for affordable housing that, among other things, promotes health and conserves energy and natural resources.
Colleges and Universities that are members of the U.S. Green Building Council:
|
Adelphi University |
|
Purdue University |
|
American University |
|
Radford University |
|
Antioch College |
|
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute |
|
Arizona State University |
|
Rice University |
|
Arizona State University |
|
Rowan University |
|
Arkansas State University |
|
Rutgers University |
|
Associated Mennonite Biblical Seminary |
|
Salisbury University |
|
Auburn University |
|
San Diego State University |
|
Ball State University |
|
Santa Clara University |
|
Beloit College |
|
Sarah Lawrence College |
|
Berea College |
|
Savannah College of Art & Design |
|
Boise State University |
|
Seattle University |
|
Boston Architectural Center |
|
SET Eastern Michigan University |
|
British Columbia Institute of Technology |
|
Smith College |
|
Brown University |
|
Southern Methodist University |
|
California Polytechnic State University |
|
St. Louis Community College |
|
California State University, Chico |
|
St. Mary's College of Maryland |
|
California State University, Fresno |
|
St. Olaf College |
|
California State University, Long Beach |
|
Stanford University |
|
Calvin College |
|
State University of New York, Albany |
|
Case Western Reserve University |
|
Stetson University |
|
Central College |
|
Syracuse University |
|
Clarion University of Pennsylvania |
|
The Principia |
|
Clemson University |
|
Universidad Metropolitana |
|
Cleveland State University |
|
University of Alabama at Birmingham |
|
College of DuPage |
|
University of Alberta |
|
College of New Rochelle |
|
University of Arizona |
|
Colorado State University |
|
University of Arkansas |
|
Columbia University |
|
University of California, Berkeley |
|
Connecticut College |
|
University of California, Davis |
|
Construction Management and Wood Products |
|
University of California, Irvine |
|
Cornell University |
|
University of California, Los Angeles |
|
Dartmouth College |
|
University of California, Merced |
|
Design Institute of San Diego |
|
University of California, Riverside |
|
Dickinson College |
|
University of California, San Diego |
|
Duke University |
|
University of California, San Francisco |
|
Duquesne University |
|
University of California, Santa Barbara |
|
Ecole Polytechnique |
|
University of California, Santa Cruz |
|
Emory University |
|
University of Centeral Florida |
|
Endicott College |
|
University of Chicago |
|
Evergreen State College |
|
University of Cincinnati |
|
Ferris State University |
|
University of Colorado at Boulder |
|
Foothill-DeAnza Community Colleges |
|
University of Colorado at Colorado Springs |
|
Furman University |
|
University of Connecticut, Storrs |
|
Georgia Institute of Technology |
|
University of Denver |
|
Grand Valley State University |
|
University of Florida |
|
Harford Community College |
|
University of Georgia |
|
Harrington College of Design |
|
University of Houston |
|
Harvard University |
|
University of Illinois at Champaign |
|
Heartland Community College |
|
University of Illinois at Chicago |
|
Heritage College |
|
University of Iowa |
|
Illinois Institute of Technology |
|
University of Kentucky |
|
Iowa Energy Center |
|
University of Maine |
|
Iowa State University |
|
University of Maryland, Baltimore |
|
Ithaca College |
|
University of Massachusetts |
|
John Wood Community College |
|
University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey |
|
Judson College |
|
University of Michigan |
|
Kansas State University |
|
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill |
|
Lane Community College |
|
University of North Florida |
|
Lansing Community College |
|
University of Oklahoma |
|
Lawrence Technological University |
|
University of Pennsylvania |
|
Los Angeles Community College District |
|
University of Pittsburgh |
|
Louisiana State University |
|
University of Puerto Rico |
|
Massachusetts College of Art |
|
University of Richmond |
|
Michigan State University |
|
University of Rochester |
|
Mills College |
|
University of Southern California |
|
Mississippi State University |
|
University of Tennessee at Knoxville |
|
MIT |
|
University of Texas at Arlington |
|
Montclair State University |
|
University of Texas at Austin |
|
Mount Holyoke College |
|
University of the South |
|
New Jersey Institute of Technology |
|
University of the Virgin Islands |
|
New York School of Interior Design |
|
University of Utah |
|
North Carolina State University |
|
University of Vermont |
|
Northern Michigan University |
|
University of Washington |
|
Northwest Missouri State University |
|
University of Wisconsin Milwaukee |
|
Northwestern University |
|
University of Wisconsin, Madison |
|
Ohlone College |
|
University of Wyoming |
|
Oregon Health & Science University |
|
Vanderbilt University |
|
Oregon University |
|
Virginia Tech |
|
Paul Smith's College |
|
Warren Wilson College |
|
Penn State University |
|
Washington State University |
|
Pennsylvania College of Technology |
|
West Chester University |
|
Philadelphia University |
|
Western State College |
|
Pima Community College |
|
Western Washington University |
|
Point Park University |
|
Williams College |
|
Pomona College |
|
Wilson Technical Community College |
|
Portland State University |
|
Woodbury University |
|
Pratt Institute |
|
York Technical College |
5 Green Building Basics
1. Having an
environmentally friendly site selection or “footprint.” Some of
the factors involved are orientation of the house to maximize natural
sunlight for heat and light, as well as shade for cooling. As a
result, the home’s furnace and air conditioning don’t have to
work as hard to maintain a comfortable house. Another goal is making
a minimal impact on the area in which the house is built. Forget
clear-cutting the entire lot; take down only the trees and bushes
that would interfere with construction. The remaining trees can help
cool the house in the summer and act as a windbreak in the winter.
And locating the home near shopping and other services will keep the
amount of driving down—a win for the entire environment.
2. Using energy
efficient designs and materials while building a “tighter” home
to prevent HVAC loss. The use of sunlight and shade for heating and
cooling is as old as mankind, but there are designs and materials
specifically designed to keep the house nearly air-tight. With less
outside air infiltrating the home, the indoor climate is much easier
to control. LED lights use a fraction of regular incandescent bulbs,
while Energy Star appliances are certified to meet strict guidelines
about how much electricity they require to operate. Because higher
insulation standards and Energy-Star-compliant appliances have
evolved over the last few decades, energy efficiency is often the
first place builders start when going green.
3. Reducing a home’s
water consumption through low-flow fixtures. It’s true that the
earliest low-flow plumbing fixtures caused problems for some
homeowners, but today’s versions are as good—if not better—than
the old water hogs. One technology is the incorporation of air into
the process; the result is a low-flow shower that feels just as
strong as the one using much more water.
4. Promoting a
healthy indoor air environment. Green builders often use some kind of
fresh-air ventilation to exhaust the stale indoor air to the outside,
while bringing in fresh air into the house and conserving energy at
the same time.
5. Emphasizing
material conservation and waste reduction while using sustainable
products in design and construction. Engineers in the
building-materials business have designed all kinds of products to
save lumber by using optimal value engineered joists and beams that
require minimal trimming and boring for mechanical run. Green
builders can go as far as recycling job-site waste and using it for
mulch in the newly planted yard.
About the author
Based in Fort Worth, Texas, Jennifer Duell-Popovec has written about a wide variety of topics and been published in several business publications including the Wall Street Journal, Executive Decision and Registered Rep. Most recently, Duell-Popovec's story on commercial green building, "The Tipping Point," was the cover story for National Real Estate Investor's November 2006 issue. She holds a Master's Degree from the prestigious Medill School of Journalism at Northwestern University in Evanston, Ill.